![]() I expect that's similar for anyone else still using Tiger. For example, I waited a long time to upgrade to Leopard myself, and at some point I got so used to seeing "requires at least Mac OS X 10.5" that I stopped looking for new applications altogether. I realise there are some other factors at play too besides the number of users to decide whether to still support an older release. The application is built to support Tiger and up, but I have not yet seen a Tiger user in the system profiles yet. I am using Sparkle with the option of tracking system profiles with every update check, but as the application is still in early 0.* releases the number of users so far is so small it's hardly statistically relevant. I am writing a new application and am wondering whether it's still worth the effort of supporting pre-Leopard versions of Mac OS X, mostly Tiger. With the Xserve, the ‘X’ became a moniker to represent Apple’s professional or EXpert hardware and distinguish them from the ‘i. ![]() Is there publicly available data somewhere with estimates on the number of users of each Mac OS X version? Particularly for the major releases (10.6.* Snow Leopard, 10.5.* Leopard. When Mac OS X 10.2 Jaguar was announced at WWDC in 2002, it was obvious that Apple now considered Mac OS X a brand and would stick to the 10 in the system version numbers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |